Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for patients with invasive bladder cancer. However, many alternative techniques to spare the bladder have been investigated. METHODS: We review the experience reported in the literature on bladder-sparing techniques, including transurethral resection, chemotherapy, and radiation for muscle-invasive disease. RESULTS: Most comparative studies indicate that local recurrence and survival outcomes for bladder-sparing approaches are inferior to those from radical cystectomy to control muscle-invasive bladder cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Although molecular biologic techniques may have the capacity to identify a subgroup who may benefit from a bladder-sparing approach, cystectomy is normally required for optimal results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rivera et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: