This paper studies what determines voters’ attitudes toward protectionist trade policy in the Philippines and Thailand. Using cross-country survey data collected in 2020, I estimate determinants of trade barrier preference in these two Southeast Asian nations. Econometric specifications are based on the Heckscher-Ohlin type factor endowment approach and specific-factor models. Empirical results support that the theoretical predictions made by the factor endowment approach are successful in explaining individual-level protectionism in the two countries: Individuals with higher educational attainment prefer higher trade barriers. However, sector-specific interest predicted by the specific-factor model does not empirically explain the voters’ attitudes toward protectionism in these two Southeast Asian nations. This means that in the Philippines and Thailand, long-run determinants suggested by the factor endowment approach are robust channels, while short-run determinants elaborated by the specific-factor model are not. By applying the comparative approach to seven Asia-Pacific nations, I emphasize distinct features in the Philippines and Thailand, such as the positive marginal effect of educational attainment and gender differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nam Seok Kim (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: