Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We applied modern molecular and functional imaging to the pretreatment assessment of lung cancer using combined dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT) and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) to phenotype tumors. Seventy-four lung cancer patients were prospectively recruited for (18)F-FDG-PET/DCE-CT using PET/64-detector CT. After technical failures, there were 64 patients (35 males, 29 females; mean age [± SD] 67.5 ± 7.9 years). DCE-CT yielded tumor peak enhancement (PE) and standardized perfusion value (SPV). The uptake of (18)F-FDG quantified on PET as the standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) assessed tumor metabolism. The median values for SUV(max) and SPV were used to define four vascular-metabolic phenotypes. There were associations (Spearman rank correlation [rs]) between tumor size and vascular-metabolic parameters: SUV(max) versus size (rs = .40, p = .001) and SUV/PE versus size (r = .43, p < .001). Patients with earlier-stage (I-IIA, n = 30) disease had mean (± SD) SUV/PE 0.36 ± 0.28 versus 0.56 ± 0.32 in later-stage (stage IIB-IV, n = 34) disease (p = .007). The low metabolism with high vascularity phenotype was significantly more common among adenocarcinomas (p = .018), whereas the high metabolism with high vascularity phenotype was more common among squamous cell carcinomas (p = .024). Other non-small cell lung carcinoma tumor types demonstrated a high prevalence of the high metabolism with low vascularity phenotype (p = .028). We show that tumor subtypes have different vascular-metabolic associations, which can be helpful clinically in managing lung cancer patients to hone targeted therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shastry et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: