Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) as well as staphylococcal enterotoxin A (SEA) and B (SEB) have recently been shown to bind directly to the class II major histocompatibility antigen, HLA-DR. Whereas others have characterized TSST-1 and SEA binding to HLA-DR on transfected L cells or B lymphoma cell lines, we sought evidence for direct binding of TSST-1 and SEA to HLA-DR on purified human monocytes. A single class of high-affinity receptors was found for both TSST-1 (dissociation constant (K d ) 40 nM, 3.4 × 10 4 receptors per cell) and SEA (K d 12 nM, 3.2 × 10 4 receptors per cell) on normal human monocytes. Affinity cross-linking of 125 I-labeled toxins to monocytes revealed the presence of two membrane protein subunits with molecular masses consistent with the α and β chains of human HLA-DR (35 and 28 kDa, respectively). The anti-HLA-DR monoclonal antibody L243, but not L203 or 2.06, inhibited radiolabeled toxin binding to human monocytes and neutralized the mitogenic response of human T lymphocytes to both toxins. However, L243 was consistently more effective in blocking radiolabeled TSST-1 than SEA binding to human monocytes from the same donors, suggesting that TSST-1 and SEA may be binding to overlapping epitopes rather than to the same epitope on HLA-DR. Because TSST-1 and SEB bind to distinct epitopes on HLA-DR and because SEA cross competes with both TSST-1 and SEB on the HLA-DR receptor, we postulate that SEA occupies a binding site within HLA-DR that overlaps both TSST-1 and SEB. Future studies focused on receptor-mediated binding of these toxins to human monocytes and T lymphocytes from normal donors and toxic shock syndrome patients may reveal the underlying anomalies that predispose particular individuals to toxic shock syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
See et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: