Key result
The nickel-albumin binding assay (NABA) discriminated patients with acute coronary syndrome with an area under the curve of 0.7582, compared to 0.7289 for the cobalt-albumin binding assay.
Why the study?
Does the automated nickel-albumin binding assay (NABA) accurately diagnose acute coronary syndrome compared to the cobalt-albumin binding assay (CABA) in patients presenting to the ER with acute chest pain?
Observational (n=89)
Does the automated nickel-albumin binding assay (NABA) accurately diagnose acute coronary syndrome compared to the cobalt-albumin binding assay (CABA) in patients presenting to the ER with acute chest pain?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.7582% vs 0.7289%
The automated nickel-albumin binding assay (NABA) may serve as an early marker of myocardial ischemia with slightly better diagnostic discrimination for ACS than the cobalt-albumin binding assay.
BACKGROUND: Myocardial ischemia may alter the metal binding capacity of circulating serum albumin. Thus, the aim of this study was to describe an automated method to measure ischemia-induced alterations in the binding capacity of serum albumin for exogenous nickel, and to evaluate the diagnostic characteristics of this assay for the assessment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients presenting to the emergency room (ER) with acute chest pain. METHODS: We assessed the concentrations of cardiac troponin I (cTnI), serum albumin, ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) measured by the cobalt-albumin binding assay (CABA), and by an automated nickel-albumin binding assay (NABA) in the following groups: ACS (n=63) and non-ischemic chest pain (NICP, n=26). Biochemical markers were determined in blood samples obtained from patients within 3 h of ER admission. RESULTS: cTnI, CABA and NABA concentrations were higher in ACS group in comparison to the NICP group. A significant correlation between NABA and CABA was observed (r=0.5387, p<0.001). Areas under the curve for CABA and NABA were 0.7289 and 0.7582, respectively. Both CABA and NABA have the ability to discriminate patients with ACS. However, NABA has a slightly higher ability to discriminate ACS compared with CABA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ACS have reduced nickel binding to human serum albumin, and NABA may have an important role as an early marker of myocardial ischemia, particularly in patients presenting to the ER with acute chest pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome (n=89). Nickel-albumin binding assay (NABA) vs. Cobalt-albumin binding assay (CABA) was evaluated on Discrimination of acute coronary syndrome (Area under the curve). The nickel-albumin binding assay (NABA) discriminated patients with acute coronary syndrome with an area under the curve of 0.7582, compared to 0.7289 for the cobalt-albumin binding assay.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: