Key result
Rivaroxaban was associated with a 16% lower rate of inpatient stays (RR 0.84) and significantly lower all-cause total healthcare costs compared to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes.
Why the study?
Healthcare resource utilization and costs among oral anticoagulant-naïve patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin in the US had not been evaluated.
Does rivaroxaban reduce healthcare resource utilization and costs compared to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes?
Cohort (n=37,155)
Does rivaroxaban reduce healthcare resource utilization and costs compared to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes?
In a real-world US population of patients with NVAF and diabetes, initiating rivaroxaban was associated with significantly lower healthcare resource utilization and total healthcare costs compared to warfarin.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rivaroxaban was associated with lower costs versus warfarin; extends real-world data but leaves open practice change in NVAF with diabetes.
INTRODUCTION: The healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs of oral anticoagulant-naïve patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and diabetes initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin in the United States (US) has not been previously evaluated. METHODS: Data Mart Database (1 January, 2012 to 30 September, 2021) to evaluate the HRU and costs of adult patients with NVAF and diabetes newly initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin (on or after January 2013). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for confounding between cohorts. HRU and costs (USD 2021) were assessed per patient-year (PPY) post-treatment initiation. Weighted cohorts were compared using rate ratios (RR) from Poisson regression models, odds ratios (OR) from logistic regression models, and cost differences; 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p values were generated using non-parametric bootstrap procedures. RESULTS: After IPTW, 17,881 and 19,274 patients initiated on rivaroxaban and warfarin were included, respectively (mean age: 73 years; 40% female). During 12 months of follow-up, the rivaroxaban cohort had lower all-cause HRU PPY across all components, including lower rates of inpatient stays (RR: 0.84, 95% CI 0.81, 0.88), outpatient visits (RR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.66, 0.68), and 30 day hospital readmission (OR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.66, 0.83; all p < 0.001) compared to the warfarin cohort. Moreover, rivaroxaban was associated with medical cost savings PPY (mean cost difference: - $9306, 95% CI - $11,769, - $6607), which compensated for higher pharmacy costs relative to warfarin (mean cost difference: $5518, 95% CI $5193, $5839), resulting in significantly lower all-cause total healthcare costs for rivaroxaban versus warfarin (mean cost difference: - $3788, 95% CI - $6258, - $1035; all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among NVAF patients with diabetes in a real-world US setting, rivaroxaban was associated with lower healthcare costs compared to warfarin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berger et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes (n=37,155). Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Inpatient stays per patient-year (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.81, 0.88, p=<0.001). Rivaroxaban was associated with a 16% lower rate of inpatient stays (RR 0.84) and significantly lower all-cause total healthcare costs compared to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: