In this paper, we deal with the problem of uniqueness of meromorphic functions that share one finite value with their derivatives and obtain some theorems which improve a result given by Rainer Bruck. Introduction and main resultsBy a meromorphic function we shall always mean a function that is meromorphic in the whole complex plane.It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the notations of the Nevanlinna theory such as Γ(r,/), ra(r,/), JV(r,/), N(r,f), S(r,f) and so on, that can be found, for instance, in [1].And Ni)(r, I//) denotes the counting function of the simple zeros of/, Npfr, I//) = N(r, I//) -Λ/Ί)(r, I//).Let / and g be meromorphic functions and a be a complex constant, we say that / and g share the value a IM (ignoring multiplicity), if /a and g -a have the same zeros, they share the value a CM (counting multiplicity), if /a and g -a have the same zeros with the same multiplicity.In 1979, E. Mues and N. Steinmetz proved the following theorem in [2].THEOREM A. Let f be an entire function which is not constant.Iff and f share two distinct values a, b, then f = f.In 1996, Rainer Briick proved the following in [3] THEOREM B. Let f be an entire function which is not constant.If f and f share the value 1 CM, and if N(r, I// 7 ) = S(r,/), then £Ξί « for some non-zero constant c.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qing Cai Zhang (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: