Key result
A simulated 3 × 3-min amateur boxing contest elicited VO2 and peak HR values ≥90% of maximums, with no significant difference in VO2max compared to treadmill testing (p>0.05).
Why the study?
How do physiological responses (VO2 and HR) during a simulated 3x3-min amateur boxing contest compare to a maximal treadmill test in elite male boxers?
Observational (n=11)
How do physiological responses (VO2 and HR) during a simulated 3x3-min amateur boxing contest compare to a maximal treadmill test in elite male boxers?
p-value: p=>0.05
A simulated 3x3-min amateur boxing contest elicits near-maximal physiological demands (>90% of VO2max and HRmax), highlighting the need for careful internal training load monitoring.
Simulated boxing elicits near-maximal demands; hypothesis-generating for HR-based load monitoring in elite athletes without practice change.
This study aimed at examining physiological responses (i.e., oxygen uptake [VO2] and heart rate [HR]) to a semi-contact 3 × 3-min format, amateur boxing combat simulation in elite level male boxers. Eleven boxers aged 21.4 ± 2.1 years (body height 173.4 ± 3.7, body mass 74.9 ± 8.6 kg, body fat 12.1 ± 1.9, training experience 5.7 ± 1.3 years) volunteered to participate in this study. They performed a maximal graded aerobic test on a motor-driven treadmill to determine maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max), oxygen uptake (VO2AT) and heart rate (HRAT) at the anaerobic threshold, and maximal heart rate (HRmax). Additionally, VO2 and peak HR (HRpeak) were recorded following each boxing round. Results showed no significant differences between VO2max values derived from the treadmill running test and VO2 outcomes of the simulated boxing contest (p > 0.05, d = 0.02 to 0.39). However, HRmax and HRpeak recorded from the treadmill running test and the simulated amateur boxing contest, respectively, displayed significant differences regardless of the boxing round (p < 0.01, d = 1.60 to 3.00). In terms of VO2 outcomes during the simulated contest, no significant between-round differences were observed (p = 0.19, d = 0.17 to 0.73). Irrespective of the boxing round, the recorded VO2 was >90% of the VO2max. Likewise, HRpeak observed across the three boxing rounds were ≥90% of the HRmax. In summary, the simulated 3 × 3-min amateur boxing contest is highly demanding from a physiological standpoint. Thus, coaches are advised to systematically monitor internal training load for instance through rating of perceived exertion to optimize training-related adaptations and to prevent boxers from overreaching and/or overtraining.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El‐Ashker et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Elite level male boxers (n=11). Simulated 3 × 3-min amateur boxing contest vs. Maximal graded aerobic test on a treadmill was evaluated on Oxygen uptake (VO2) and heart rate (HR) responses (p=>0.05). A simulated 3 × 3-min amateur boxing contest elicited VO2 and peak HR values ≥90% of maximums, with no significant difference in VO2max compared to treadmill testing (p>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: