Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a frequently encountered problem in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Some patients with severe SHPT could not be managed by medical treatment and are ineligible for surgical resection. PURPOSE: Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy, safety of microwave ablation (MWA) on these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1 April 2015 and 28 February 2017, 35 patients (M/F 19/16, age 49.8 ± 12.9 years) were enrolled. All patients were treated with MWA. Levels of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and of serum calcium and phosphorus were compared pre- and post-ablation. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare treatment outcomes pre- and post-ablation. RESULTS: Complete ablation was achieved in all 63 glands in the 35 patients with SHPT. The mean follow-up time was 15.9 ± 2.2 months. The maximum gland diameter was 6-31 mm (mean, 14.9 ± 5.5 mm). The trends of the changes in iPTH and calcium levels showed a curve: the level of iPTH and calcium at 6 months post-ablation were lower than those pre-ablation (both p < .0001); after then iPTH remained relatively stable and the end of follow up, with no rebound (p < .0001), while instead of calcium at the end of follow up was not significantly lower than pre-ablation (p = .462). The trend in the change in phosphate levels showed a straight line; the level of phosphate at 6 months post-ablation and at the end of follow up both were significantly lower than pre-MWA (p < .001). There was no major complication. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, MWA was used successfully to treat SHPT patients who are ineligible for surgical resection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhuo et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: