Developmental and seasonal changes in the preferred prey and the diet composition of the invertebrate predator Chaoborus punctipennis were determined in Plastic Lake, an acidified (pH 5.6) lake in south-central Ontario, Canada. All instars consumed rotifers (mainly Keratella cochlearis, Ploesoma sp., and Asplanchna priodonta), and instars III and IV fed preferentially on crustaceans (mainly bosminids and copepods). Phytoflagellates (Peridinium sp. and Dinobryon sp.), however, numerically dominated the diet of all instars examined (II–IV), and were consumed by instar II larvae in excess of their relative availability. On 40 and 20% of the sampling dates, instars III and IV, respectively, consumed phytoflagellates in accordance with their relative abundance in the lake. Although the contribution of phytoflagellates to the biomass-based diet of C. punctipennis was low, on one occasion phytoflagellates formed almost half of the diet biomass of instar II larvae. A review of the literature shows that in lakes where phytoflagellate densities are high (≥ 100–200/mL), phytoflagellates contribute ≥ 50% of the diet biomass of all instars of Chaoborus spp. These findings indicate that Chaoborus spp. are omnivores that frequently feed on phytoflagellates even when alternative animal prey are abundant. Consumption of phagotrophic phytoflagellates by Chaoborus spp. and other large invertebrate omnivores, such as Mysis spp., Epischura spp., and cyclopoid copepods, may increase the transfer efficiency of organic carbon from the microbial food web to the upper trophic levels in fresh waters. In acidified lakes, consumption of large dinoflagellates by Chaoborus spp. and other invertebrate omnivores may ameliorate the hypothesized bottleneck impeding the flow of carbon between phytoplankton and zooplankton.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: