Why the study?
Campylobacter is a common cause of gastroenteritis, but its potential to cause cardiac involvement like myopericarditis is rare, underestimated, and pathogenetically not well elucidated.
This case highlights that Campylobacter gastroenteritis can rarely cause acute myopericarditis, which may mimic acute coronary syndrome but can be successfully managed with conservative supportive care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cardiac symptoms during Campylobacter gastroenteritis warrant myopericarditis consideration; hypothesis-generating for incidence and mechanisms.
Myopericarditis is a rare but recognised extra-intestinal manifestation of Campylobacter jejuni infection, particularly in the absence of any underlying disease. While Campylobacter is a common cause of bacterial gastroenteritis, its potential to cause cardiac involvement is usually underestimated.The pathogenic process is not well elucidated but is most likely to involve direct bacterial invasion, immune processes, or systemic inflammation. In the early stages, symptoms may simulate acute coronary syndromes and therefore present diagnostic challenges. We present the case of a previously healthy young adult patient who had developed myopericarditis following an episode of self-limiting Campylobacter gastroenteritis. The diagnosis was established by electrocardiography, cardiac biomarker testing, echocardiogram (ECG), and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). Late gadolinium enhancement revealed sub-epicardial enhancement in the basal inferior and inferolateral segments, consistent with myopericarditis. The patient was conservatively managed with intravenous fluids, analgesia, and cardiac monitoring and made a complete recovery. This case emphasises the requirement of a strong suspicion of cardiac complications in patients presenting with chest pain following recent gastrointestinal illness. Prompt identification and adequate management can yield excellent results and prevent disastrous outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baronos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: