Seismic fragility analysis is a complex process involving different sources of uncertainties. In this paper, an alternative procedure for seismic fragility analysis based on the uniform design method (UD) is proposed. UD is used to generate a reasonable sample to build probabilistic seismic demand models (PSDMs), which are used to generate the fragility curves of a cable-stayed bridge. Sensitivity analyses of different uncertainties are carried out by comparison of the fragility curves for different components. It is concluded that (1) the UD method can consider different sources of uncertainties in fragility analysis with reasonable accuracy; (2) the bridge system is more fragile than any component of bridges; and (3) the damage probability of fragility considering uncertainty in the ground motion, geometry, and material is larger than that considering only the uncertainty in the ground motion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pang et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: