Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper uses content analysis to examine 66 reviews on 33 manuscripts submitted to Accounting and Finance . Selected extracts from reviews are provided to illustrate the issues considered important to reviewers. The main message is that papers need to be work‐shopped and more care taken over editorial matters. A checklist for prospective authors is provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael E. Bradbury (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: