Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We studied atomic contact potential variations of Si(111)-7 x 7 by Kelvin probe force microscopy with the amplitude modulation technique at the second resonance of a silicon cantilever. Enhanced sensitivity due to the high mechanical quality factor in ultra-high vacuum enabled local contact potential difference (LCPD) measurements of individual adatoms. The contrast of the measured LCPD map became stronger by reducing the tip-sample distance, and the averaged LCPD value shifted to more negative. The short-range interaction, arising from the covalent bonding interactions, strongly affects the LCPD measurement. Theoretical calculations indicate that the amplitude modulation method has a higher sensitivity than the frequency modulation method in practical cases. The tip-sample distance dependence of LCPD was investigated by numerical calculations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawai et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: