Two assay procedures were used to study ethanol oxidation by crystalline horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase: (A) Acetaldehyde formed by ethanol oxidation (with and without lactaldehyde) was distilled into a semicarbazide solution and the absorbance of the acetaldehyde semicarbazone formed was measured at 224 nm. (B) 1,2-propandiol formed in the coupled oxidation-reduction reaction (CH 2 CH 2 OH + CH 2 · was measured by a colorimetric method. The K M for ethanol oxidation at pH 7.5 was 0.35 m m . With increasing concentrations of lactaldehyde, both the V M and the K M for ethanol oxidation were increased. At different concentrations of lactaldehyde, the ratio K M V M was found to be constant. The K M for lactaldehyde was 1.1 m m and was not affected by addition of ethanol. The K M for NAD + (H) in the coupled O-R reaction was 4.5 μ m . Propanol and butanol could replace ethanol in the coupled O-R reaction, but were inhibitory at high concentrations. Increasing the lactaldehyde concentration partially relieved this inhibition. In addition to lactaldehyde, glyceraldehyde also stimulated ethanol oxidation. The V M and K M values of three alcohol:aldehyde pairs were compared to determine how the substrate nature controls the efficiency of an alcohol:aldehyde pair in the coupled O-R reaction. Several NAD + analogs were tested in the coupled O-R reaction. It was observed that although these analogs were more active than NAD + in ethanol oxidation in the absence of lactaldehyde, they were less active than NAD + when lactaldehyde was present. A mechanism has been proposed to explain the coupled oxidoreductase activity of liver alcohol dehydrogenase. The mechanism postulates that the rate-limiting step in the coupled oxidoreductase reaction is either the ternary complex interconversions (E-NAD + -RCH 2 OH ⇌ E-NADH-RCHO), or the dissociation steps leading to the formation of E-NAD + (H) and product. The mechanism is consistent with the kinetic results described in this paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woodley et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: