Defining clinically relevant citrullinated epitopes is crucial for understanding the pathophysiology and immune activation in rheumatoid arthritis.
May refine ACPA research focus in RA; leaves open clinical translation to diagnostics or therapy.
Anti–citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs)are highly specific for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) andhave thus become part of the diagnostic armamentariumin inflammatory arthritis. Circumstantial clinical evi-dence also suggests that ACPAs may participate inimportant pathophysiologic processes in RA. This con-cept has recently been supported by the specific gene–environment interaction between smoking and HLA–DR4 in ACPA-positive but not ACPA-negative patientswith RA and by the enhancement of tissue injury byACPAs in experimental arthritis. In parallel, importantprogress has been made in the detection and identifica-tion of citrullinated proteins as potential targets forACPAs in inflamed synovium as well as other tissue.However, it becomes increasingly clear that well-definedcitrullinated epitopes, rather than the mere presence ofcitrullinated proteins as such, may be relevant for theinduction of ACPAs and, eventually, for the pathogenic-ity of anticitrulline reactivity. Therefore, defining theclinically relevant citrullinated epitopes and experimen-tally assessing the requirements for optimal and coordi-nated immune activation by these epitopes are 2 majorchallenges in this field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cantaert et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: