Why the study?
Does wearing graduated compression stockings affect sympathetic activity and heart rate variability in men with spinal cord injury?
Does wearing graduated compression stockings affect sympathetic activity and heart rate variability in men with spinal cord injury?
Graduated compression stockings enhance sympathetic activity in individuals with paraplegia, which may help prevent orthostatic or post-exercise hypotension.
May support sympathetic enhancement with graduated compression stockings in paraplegia; leaves open effects on hypotension.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether wearing graduated compression stockings (GCS) could affect the sympatho-adrenergic and heart rate variability (HRV) responses at rest and after a strenuous wheelchair exercise in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Crossover trial. SETTING: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Saint Etienne, France. PARTICIPANTS: Nine men with SCI (five with low paraplegia: LP, four with high paraplegia: HP). INTERVENTIONS: Two maximal wheelchair exercise tests: with and without GCS (21 mmHg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HRV measurements: high frequency (HF), low frequency (LF), and LF/HF ratio. Norepinephrine (NOR) and epinephrine (EPI), at rest and post-exercise. Secondary measures were: blood pressure, heart rate, maximal power output, oxygen uptake, stroke volume, cardiac output, at rest, during and after exercise. RESULTS: When wearing GCS: LFnu(wavelet-post) significantly increased and HFnu(wavelet-post) significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in SCI subjects, leading to an enhance ratio of LF(wavelet)/HF(wavelet) and a significantly increased in NOR(rest) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: GCS induces an enhanced sympathetic activity in individuals with paraplegia, regardless of the level of the injury. Enhanced post-exercise sympathetic activity with GCS may help prevent orthostatic hypotension or post-exercise hypotension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rimaud et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: