Causal discovery is continually being enriched with new algorithms for learning causal graphical probabilistic models. Each one of them requires a set of hyperparameters, creating a great number of combinations. Given that the true graph is unknown and the learning task is unsupervised, the challenge to a practitioner is how to tune these choices. We propose out-of-sample causal tuning (OCT) that aims to select an optimal combination. The method treats a causal model as a set of predictive models and uses out-of-sample protocols for supervised methods. This approach can handle general settings like latent confounders and nonlinear relationships. The method uses an information-theoretic approach to be able to generalize to mixed data types and a penalty for dense graphs to penalize for complexity. To evaluate OCT, we introduce a causal-based simulation method to create datasets that mimic the properties of real-world problems. We evaluate OCT against two other tuning approaches, based on stability and in-sample fitting. We show that OCT performs well in many experimental settings and it is an effective tuning method for causal discovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biza et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: