Because of problems with reliability and undetermined validity, psychodynamic case formulations have for a long time had limited scientific value. This article reviews some of the recent methods for making psychodynamic case formulations: 1) Malan's Method for Overall Psychodynamic Formulations; 2) The Plan Formulation Method (Mr. Zion); 3) The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme Method (Luborsky); and 4) The Idiographic Conflict Formulation Method and The Psychodynamic Conflict Rating Scales (Perry). The application of these methods is illustrated by a comparison of three different methods in the same case, successfully treated in brief dynamic psychotherapy. The usefulness of the methods for guiding treatment is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Høglend et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: