The effects of nicardipine on smooth muscle cells of the guinea pig basilar artery were investigated by means of microelectrode and isometric tension recording methods. Nicardipine (1×10−8−3×10−6M) did not modify the membrane potential and resistance of smooth muscle cells. The spike evoked by application of outward current pulse in the presence of tetraethylammonium (>1×10−3M) was inhibited by 1x10−9M and was almost blocked by 3×10−7M nicardipine. Perivascular nerve stimulation evoked the excitatory junction potential which was slightly suppressed by 3×10−6M nicardipine. The contraction evoked by excess concentration of [K], NaCl-free solution or ATP was abolished and by 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HTJ was markedly inhibited in Ca-free EGTA containing solution, but that induced by caffeine was only slightly inhibited. Nicardipine (>3×10−10M) markedly inhibited the K-induced contraction. The ATP induced contractions were inhibited by nicardipine (>1×10−8M) to a lesser extent than the K-induced contractions. On the other hand, nicardipine (1×10−6M) had no effect on the NaCl-free- or 5-HT-induced contraction. When nicardipine (1×10−6M) was applied during 2.5mM Ca loading to muscle cells after depletion of the stored Ca, the subsequently generated caffeine-induced contraction was slightly depressed due to inhibition of the passive Ca influx. These results indicate that nicardipine possesses a selective inhibitory action on the Ca channel, but that the inhibition is limited to particular Ca influxes such as the voltage dependent ones, but not the receptor operated and NaCl-free induced Ca influxes. This agent acts predominantly on the post-junctional muscle rather than on the prejunctional nerve terminal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujiwara et al. (1983) studied this question.