Why the study?
Hepatectomy carries high morbidity and mortality, making early prediction and prevention of major complications valuable for patient care.
Does the Surgical APGAR score combined with ALT/AST values predict major complications in patients undergoing hepatectomy?
Does the Surgical APGAR score combined with ALT/AST values predict major complications in patients undergoing hepatectomy?
The Surgical APGAR score combined with ALT/AST values provides risk stratification for major post-surgical complications after hepatectomy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Combining SAS with ALT/AST may enhance post-hepatectomy complication prediction; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Hepatectomy is a complex procedure with high morbidity and mortality. Early prediction/prevention of major complications is highly valuable for patient care. Surgical APGAR score (SAS) has been validated to predict post-surgical complications (PCs). We aimed to define a simple complications classification following hepatectomy based on a therapy-oriented severity Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). 119 patients undergoing liver resection were included. PCs were determined at follow-up based on CDC. Clinicopathological factors were used to calculate SAS. A receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis estimated the predictive value of SAS for PCs. Circulating markers levels of liver injury were analyzed as critical elements on PCs. SAS (P=0.008), estimated blood-loss (P=0.018) and operation time (P=0.0008) were associated with PCs. SAS was reduced in patients with (+) compared to those without (-) complications (6.64±1.84 vs 5.70±1.79, P=0.0079). The area-under-the-curve was 0.646 by ROC, indicating an acceptable discrimination with 65% possibility to distinguish (-) and (+) groups (P=0.004). Best cutoff value for SAS was ≤6/≥7, at which sensitivity and specificity were maximal. ALT/ASL levels were significantly different within the group with 9-10 SAS points (P=0.01 and 0.02). In conclusion, SAS provides accurate risk stratification for major PCs after hepatectomy, and might help improving the overall patient outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitsiev et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: