The problem of seeking an optimal parking policy is formulated here as a Stackelberg game between the government and the travelers. The government wishes to encourage transit ridership while keeping a strong urban center; unlike most existing tools that assist in determining parking policies, the proposed game includes an explicit quantitative formulation of the governmental objective. Each traveler wishes to gain a maximum utility from his choice of destination and transportation mode, and the choice distribution of all travelers is obtained by Logit model. A fundamental difference exists between Game Theory practice and common assumptions used in transportation modeling regarding the relationship between a single traveler’s utility and the choice distribution of all travelers. This difference is tackled here through the definition of the player that represents the travelers and its objective function. A simple version of the game is tested in 24 imaginary scenarios of transportation and urban conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hollander et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: