Why the study?
Although fondaparinux has proven efficacy and safety in multiple trials, limited data exist on whether these results are reproduced in real-world practice in an Indian population.
Does fondaparinux prevent recurrence of ACS and major bleeding in hospitalized Indian patients with symptomatic acute coronary syndrome?
Does fondaparinux prevent recurrence of ACS and major bleeding in hospitalized Indian patients with symptomatic acute coronary syndrome?
In a real-world Indian cohort, fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily was effective and safe for managing ACS, with very low rates of recurrent ACS and no major bleeding.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Real-world Indian ACS data on fondaparinux support tolerability; leaves open whether trial efficacy generalizes, pending larger studies.
INTRODUCTION: Fondaparinux is a low molecular weight heparin anticoagulant used to manage the full spectrum of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients and has proved its efficacy and safety in multiple clinical trials. However, there are limited data available showing whether the same results could be reproduced in real-world practice on an Indian population. Our objective was to determine the effectiveness and tolerability of fondaparinux in the management of symptomatic ACS in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: The EMR data of hospitalized ACS patients (n = 611), from January 2015 to January 2020, representing UA or NSTEMI or STEMI and were prescribed fondaparinux (2.5 mg once daily) to manage ACS were analyzed. The effectiveness was analyzed as recurrence of ACS and tolerability as total incidence of major bleeding during hospitalization, at 30 days and 180 days. Appropriate statistical analysis was used with a statistically significance of p value < 0.05. RESULTS: The incidence of recurrent ACS was not seen during hospitalization and in the first 30 days, while in only 0.65% (n = 4) patients, ACS reoccurred within 180 days. In a mean duration of 172.75 ± 3.20 days, UA was reported in 0.49% (n = 3) patients, NSTEMI in 0.16% (n = 1) of patients, and STEMI was not documented. None of the major bleeding events occurred during the entire study period, whereas minor bleeding events were reported during hospitalization 0.98% (n = 6) and at 30 days 0.16% (n = 1). The bleeding events were statistically insignificant (p value > 0.05). No incidences of stent thrombosis were reported during the entire study period. CONCLUSIONS: In the real world, fondaparinux was found to be effective and tolerable when used to manage symptomatic ACS patients regardless of revascularization procedure with no incidence of stent thrombosis, and minimal recurrent ACS and insignificant increase in bleeding events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalal et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: