Why the study?
Does prasugrel reduce ischemic complications and mortality compared to clopidogrel or ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Does prasugrel reduce ischemic complications and mortality compared to clopidogrel or ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Registry data supports the use of prasugrel as an effective and safe P2Y12 inhibitor, superior to clopidogrel and at least non-inferior to ticagrelor, in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support prasugrel preference in ACS-PCI registries; leaves open need for contemporary RCTs versus ticagrelor.
The possibilities of P2Y 12 receptor inhibitors application in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are discussed in the article. The results of 4 registries in which a comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of prasugrel with clopidogrel or ticagrelor was performed, as well as of all 3 P2Y 12 -receptor inhibitors among themselves, are considered in detail. The feasibility of replacing clopidogrel to prasugrel during the inpatient treatment of patients with ACS and PCI was evaluated additionally in the MULTIPRAC registry. The results of the registries demonstrate that the use of prasugrel in patients with ACS and PCI is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of ischemic complications and mortality with an acceptable risk of bleeding. At the same time, prasugrel was more effective and safer than clopidogrel and at least was non-inferior to ticagrelor, and according to some registries, even surpasses it in a number of indicators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
N. M. Vorobyeva (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: