Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Porcine Leydig, cultured in a chemically defined medium, express luteotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin (LH/hCG) receptor and mRNA transcripts of several sizes (7.6, 6.7, 5.6, 4.7, 4, 2.6 and 1.4 kb). Incubation of these cells with hCG results in a concentration-dependent decrease of both LH/hCG receptor number and of all mRNA transcripts with a half-maximal at 0.01 nM. Time-course analysis of the effects of maximal (1 nM) concentration of hCG on both receptor number and mRNA levels results in a lag period of about 6-8 h. Thereafter, the receptor number progressively declines to reach a low point (20% of control) at 36 h, whereas more than 80% of receptor mRNA were lost between 8-12 h after addition of the hormone. By nuclear run-on assays, we showed that hCG caused a slight reduction (13 +/- 2%) in LH/hCG receptor gene transcription, which could not explain the rapid and pronounced mRNA decline observed between 8-12 h. In fact, we estimated that hCG reduced 10-fold (from < 22 h to 2 h) the half-life of LH/hCG receptor mRNA. Both actinomycin D and cycloheximide blocked the hCG-induced decrease in both receptor number and mRNA levels. These results indicate that the main mechanism by which hCG regulates its own receptor is by inducing a decrease in the stability of its own receptor mRNA and this effect requires induction of transcription and translation, presumably leading to synthesis of a labile factor(s) which favors the degradation of LH/hCG mRNA. Most of the effects of hCG are mediated by cAMP since treatment of cells with its 8-bromo derivative leads to a similar reduction in the level of LH/hCG receptor and mRNA. Finally, the effects of hCG are reversible, since after withdrawal of the hormone there was a recovery of receptor mRNA followed by receptor number.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chuzel et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: