Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of a six-minute walk test in adults with cerebral palsy. DESIGN: Four repeated walk tests during two weeks. SETTING: The tests were conducted in a 40-m-long corridor at a rehabilitation centre for outpatients. SUBJECTS: Twenty-five adults (9 women and 16 men) with CP. Mean age 36 (26-58) years. Twelve subjects walked with walking aids and 13 without. INTERVENTIONS: No intervention. MEASURES: The subjects were instructed to walk as far as possible for 6 min. The distance walked, heart rate and perceived exertion were assessed. RESULTS: Mean distances walked by the subjects in the four tests were 316, 336, 341 and 345 m. The repeatability between test 1 and the other tests was 66 m, and when the first walk test was excluded 40 m. The coefficient of variation (CV) between test 1 and the other tests varied between 7.1 and 8.7%, and when the first walk test was excluded between 3.7 and 4.5%. Intraclass correlation (ICC 1.1) was 0.97 in the four tests, and when the first walk test was excluded 0.99. Walking distance was longer (P<0.01) and varied less in subjects walking without walking aids (n = 13) compared with subjects using walking aids (n = 12). CONCLUSIONS: Six-minute walk test showed high reliability, with a repeatability of 40 m. One practice test is recommended, as the walking distance in the first test was significantly shorter (P<0.01) than the other three tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersson et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: