In guinea-pig ileum submucosal arterioles, ACh-induced hyperpolarization is causally related to arteriolar dilatation and is mediated by specific K+ channels and intracellular Ca2+ release.
Preclinical findings preclude practice change; leaves open translation of these K+ channel and Ca2+ mechanisms to human microvessels.
The effects of inhibition of acetylcholine (ACh)-induced hyperpolarization on dilatation of submucosal arterioles were investigated in the guinea-pig ileum. 2. In smooth muscles of the arterioles depolarized by Ba(2+) (0.5 mM) to about -40 mV, ACh (3 microM) repolarized the membrane to about -65 mV (hyperpolarization), irrespective of the absence or presence of L-N(omega)-nitroarginine (L-NOARG, 0.1 mM) and diclofenac (1 microM), and increased the diameter (dilatation). 3. Combined application of charybdotoxin (CTX, 50 nM) and apamin (0.1 microM), inhibitors of some types of K(+)-channels, abolished the ACh-induced hyperpolarization and dilatation. 4. 18 beta-Glycerrhetinic acid (18 beta-GA, 30 microM), a known inhibitor of gap junctions, depolarized the membrane to about -36 mV, either in the absence or in the presence of Ba(2+), with no associated contraction of the arterioles. In the presence of 18 beta-GA, ACh-induced hyperpolarization was abolished, however the dilatation was inhibited only partially, with associated inhibition of constriction produced by Ba(2+) and NA. 5. 18 beta-GA inhibited the dilatation produced by sodium nitroprusside, an NO donor. 6. The ACh-induced hyperpolarization and dilatation were abolished in the presence of 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (30 microM), an inhibitory modulator of inositol trisphosphate receptor-mediated Ca(2+) release from intracellular stores. 7. It is concluded that in submucosal arterioles, hyperpolarizations produced by ACh have causal relationship to the arteriolar dilatation. 18 beta-GA did not induce parallel relationship between hyperpolarization and dilatation produced by ACh. 18 beta-GA may have unidentified inhibitory effects on agonist-mediated actions, in addition to the inhibition of gap junctions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imaeda et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: