Why the study?
Does a 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel improve rapid platelet inhibition compared to a 150-mg loading dose in Japanese patients undergoing coronary stent placement?
Does a 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel improve rapid platelet inhibition compared to a 150-mg loading dose in Japanese patients undergoing coronary stent placement?
A 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel achieves more rapid platelet inhibition than a 150-mg dose in Japanese patients undergoing coronary stenting, supporting the use of the standard higher dose in this population.
May support faster inhibition with 300-mg loading in Japanese stenting patients; leaves open clinical outcome benefits pending RCTs.
BACKGROUND: The loading dose of ticlopidine is 500 mg in both the US and Europe and 200 mg in Japan. A lower loading dose of clopidogrel might achieve adequate platelet inhibition in Japanese patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Platelet aggregation was serially measured at baseline, and 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after 150-mg (n=20) and 300-mg (n=20) clopidogrel loading. Platelets were stimulated with 5 and 20 micromol/L adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and aggregation was assessed by optical aggregometry. Pretreatment ADP-induced platelet aggregation in the 150-mg clopidogrel group did not differ from that of the 300-mg group. The administration of 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose resulted in lower platelet aggregation 2 h after the administration (5 micromol/L ADP: 53+/-9% vs 61+/-12%, p<0.05 and 20 micromol/L ADP: 61+/-10% vs 68+/-9%, p<0.05). A lower platelet aggregation induced with 20 micromol/L ADP was still observed 4 h after the 300-mg clopidogrel loading (58+/-10% vs 65+/-9%, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 150-mg clopidogrel loading does not achieve rapid platelet inhibition. The 300-mg loading dose should be used to suppress platelet function rapidly even in Japanese patients undergoing coronary stent placement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukushima et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: