Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
November 1, 2017Clinical CardiologyOpen Access

Transcatheter vs surgical aortic‐valve replacement in low‐ to intermediate‐surgical‐risk candidates: A meta‐analysis and systematic review

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does TAVR provide similar mortality outcomes compared to SAVR in low- to intermediate-surgical-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis?

Population

9,851 low- to intermediate-surgical-risk patients with severe/critical aortic stenosis from 4 RCTs and 8…

Comparison

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR)

Design

Meta-analysis

Follow-up

short term, mid-term, and long term

Authors

SKSafi U. KhanALAhmad Naeem LoneMSMuhammad A Saleem

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports TAVR or SAVR selection in low- to intermediate-risk aortic stenosis; confirms long-term mortality equivalence in RCT meta-analysis.

Structured PICO

Does TAVR provide similar mortality outcomes compared to SAVR in low- to intermediate-surgical-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis?

P
Population
9,851 low- to intermediate-surgical-risk patients with severe/critical aortic stenosis from 4 RCTs and 8 prospective matched studies
I
Intervention
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)
C
Comparator
Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR)
O
Outcome
All-cause mortality (short term, mid-term, and long term)hard clinical

TAVR provides similar mortality outcomes compared with SAVR in low- to intermediate-surgical-risk patients with critical aortic stenosis, though with differing adverse event profiles.

Cite This Study

Khan et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a866ee9bc4cc88ab5833f6ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/clc.22807
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share