Why the study?
Does the self-reported Duke Activity Status Index correlate with performance-based measures of functional capacity in individuals with chronic stroke?
Does the self-reported Duke Activity Status Index correlate with performance-based measures of functional capacity in individuals with chronic stroke?
The Duke Activity Status Index is a valid self-reported tool that correlates moderately well with performance-based functional capacity in chronic stroke patients.
May support DASI as a convenient self-report option in chronic stroke; leaves open prospective validation against outcomes.
[Purpose] The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between self-reported and valid performance-based measures of functional capacity in individuals with chronic stroke. [Subjects and Methods] Self-reported measures of functional capacity of 31 individuals with chronic stroke were assessed by the Duke Activity Status Index scores, whereas performance-based measures were assessed by the distance covered (in meters) and oxygen consumption (relative oxygen consumption, in ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) ) during the six-minute walking test. [Results] The subjects had a mean age of 58.6±13 years and a mean time since the onset of stroke of 28.3±15.1 months. They had a mean Duke Activity Status Index of 27.3±14.4, mean distance covered of 325.2±140.2 m, and mean relative oxygen consumption of 9.6±2.3 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) . Significant, positive, and moderate to good correlation coefficients were found between the Duke Activity Status Index scores and the distance covered during the six-minute walking test (r=0.68). Significant, positive, and fair associations were also found between the Duke Activity Status Index scores and relative oxygen consumption values obtained during the six-minute walking test (r=0.45). [Conclusion] The findings of the present study support the clinical use of the Duke Activity Status Index as a tool to assist in clinical evaluations of functional capacity of individuals with chronic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polese et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: