Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The [TpRu(pn)](+) fragment (Tp = tripyrazolyl, pn = Ph(2)PCH(2)CH(2)NMe(2)), featuring a strong sigma acceptor and a weak pi donor, forms reversible complexes with a variety of sigma donor ligands L including N(2) which appears to be more strongly bonded than even CH(3)CN. X-ray crystal structures of the complexes with L = H(2)O, acetone, CO, N(2), and vinylidene are included (adding to that for L = CH(3)CN from former work), as well as a comparative MO study on the bonding nature of L. The sequence of complex stabilities of [TpRu(pn)L](+) is CF(3)SO(3)(-) < acetone approximately H(2)O < CH(3)CN < N(2) < CO < vinylidene as suggested from EHMO calculations and crystallographic data as well as qualitative experimental results. Despite the notable stability of [TpRu(pn)(eta(1)-N(2))](+), the N-N bond length is 1.097(5) Å, exactly that in free N(2). Our analysis suggests that the insensitivity of the N-N bond essentially originates from the counterbalance of pi bond weakening (through back-donation) and sigma bond strengthening (through reducing the antibonding character of the sigma (2sigma(u)) MO in molecular dinitrogen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trimmel et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: