Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A new family of [2 × 2] tetranuclear 3d-4f heterometallic complexes have been synthesized. These are [Zn(2)Dy(2)L(2)(μ(3)-OH)(2)(μ(4)-OH)(dbm)(2)(MeOH)(2)](NO(3))·2H(2)O·MeOH (3), [Ni(2)Dy(2)L(2)(μ(3)-OH)(2)(μ(4)-OH)(dbm)(2)(MeOH)(2)](NO(3))·MeOH (4), [Ni(2)La(2)L(2)(μ(3)-OH)(2)(μ(4)-OH)(dbm)(2)(MeOH)(2)](ClO(4))·H(2)O·2MeOH (5), [Ni(2)Tb(2)L(2)(μ(3)-OH)(2)(μ(4)-OH)(dbm)(2) (MeOH)(2)](NO(3))·MeOH (6), and [Ni(2)Gd(2)L(2)(μ(3)-OH)(2)(μ(4)-OH)(dbm)(2)(MeOH)(2)](NO(3))·MeOH (7), [H(2)L = N,N'-dimethyl-N,N'-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)ethylenediamine and Hdbm = dibenzoylmethane] obtained through a single-pot synthesis using [Zn(HL)(dbm)] (for 3)/[Ni(HL)(dbm)]·2CH(3)OH (for 4, 5, 6, and 7) as 3d-metal ion precursors. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis and electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectroscopy have been used to establish their identities. Compounds are isostructural, in which the metal ions are all connected together by a bridging hydroxido ligand in a rare μ(4)-mode. In complexes 3-7, the metal ions are antiferromagnetically coupled. Taking a cue from the results of 3 and 5, precise estimations have been made for the antiferromagnetic Ni···Ni (J(Ni) = -50 cm(-1)), Ni···Gd (J(NiGd) = -4.65 cm(-1)), and Gd···Gd (J(Gd) = -0.02 cm(-1)) exchange interactions in 7, involving the gadolinium(III) ions. The Zn(II)(2)Dy(III)(2) compound 3 has shown the tail of an out-of-phase signal in alternating current (AC) susceptibility measurement, indicative of slow relaxation of magnetization. Interestingly, the Ni(II)(2)Dy(III)(2) compound 4 in which both the participating metal ions possess large single ion anisotropy, has failed to show up any slow magnetic relaxation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abtab et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: