Five representative enantiomerically pure, hindered terpenes, derived from α-pinene, namely 2-organylapopinenes (2-R-apopinenes, R = Et, Pr, i -Bu, Ph, and i -Pr) have been treated with 9-borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane (9-BBN) in a 1:1 molar ratio in THF at 24 °C and the rate of hydroboration followed. Increasing the bulk of the 2-R group from the 2-methyl of α-pinene (Ipc, 2-methylapopinene) to 2-ethyl- (Eap), to 2-propyl- (Prap), to 2-isobutyl- ( i -Bap), to 2-phenyl- (Pap), and to 2-isopropyl- ( i -Prap) significantly lowers the rate of hydroboration with 9-BBN. Thus, the rate of hydroboration of α-pinene with 9-BBN is faster than the rates for the 2-R-apopinenes studied. The sterically bulkier 2-isobutyl-, 2-phenyl-, and 2-isopropylapopinenes reveal a significantly slower rate of hydroboration with 9-BBN. At an elevated temperature, 65 °C, the reaction of 9-BBN (1.0 equiv) with a slight excess of optically pure 2-isobutyl- and 2-phenylapopinenes (1.10−1.20 equiv), under neat conditions, is facilitated to provide the desired B -(2-organylapoisopinocampheyl)-9-borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes (2-organyl = isobutyl- and phenyl) in quantitative yield. Unfortunately, this synthesis failed for 2-isopropylapopinene. Fortunately, an indirect synthesis proved satisfactory. Treatment of enantiomerically pure (2-isopropylapoisopinocampheyl)borane, i -PrapBH 2, conveniently synthesized from 2-isopropylapopinene, and 1,5-cyclooctadiene (1,5-COD), provided, after thermal isomerization, the desired 1:1 adduct [ B -(2-Rap)-9-BBN; 2-Rap = 2-isopropylapoisopinyl skeleton] in quantitative yield. Consequently, five of the 2-R-apopinenes, R = Et, Pr, i -Bu, Ph, and i -Pr, have been successfully converted into the corresponding B -(2-Rap)-9-BBN derivatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhokte et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: