Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Yellow River irrigation districts must maintain food production under variable inflows, rigid diversion quotas, sedimentation, groundwater depletion, and soil salinization. This systematic review synthesized 79 journal articles from Web of Science and CNKI to clarify how resilience can be assessed and managed at the irrigation-district scale. The evidence indicates that resilience is a time-dependent combination of resistance, recovery, adaptability, and transformability within a coupled water source–canal–field–drainage–ecology–institution system. Although composite indices and hydrological–crop models have advanced, three gaps remain: operational thresholds rarely connect indicators to failure and recovery; farmer and institutional feedbacks are weakly represented; and assessments seldom translate into executable schedules. We, therefore, propose an irrigation-district-specific framework that couples water, sediment, salt, crops, ecology, and governance across basin–district–field scales without transferring risk between scales. Management priorities differ spatially: upstream districts require coordinated water–salt control; middle-reach well–canal systems require surface-water substitution and groundwater recovery; and downstream diversion districts require multi-source allocation and adaptive intake. A digital twin-based closed loop—continuous monitoring, forecasting, optimization, operational commands, and feedback correction—can translate diagnosis into canal rotation, recharge, drainage, and emergency actions. This review provides operational indicators and a decision-oriented research agenda for resilient irrigation modernization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: