Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To estimate pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) national program impact on pneumococcal complicated pneumonia (PnCP) based on changes in PnCP population-based incidence, PnCP proportion of all-cause complicated pneumonia (or invasive pneumococcal disease), and PnCP serotype distribution. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Global Index Medicus articles (2001-March 2022) reporting laboratory-confirmed PnCP studies were stratified by age group, outcome measure, PCV program period(s) (pre-PCV, transition, and post-PCV), serotype distribution (based on serotyping methodology used), and PCV serotype formulation. Random effect meta-analysis of the total number of serotyped isolates within each study was used to calculate pooled serotype-specific percentages. RESULTS: Of 1360 publications screened, the 134 studies included from 30 countries differed widely by methodological approaches. Pediatric PnCP incidence tended to decline from pre-PCV to post-PCV periods, as did PnCP as a proportion of all-cause complicated pneumonia from transition to post-PCV periods. Studies describing changes in serotype distribution by PCV program period applied detection methods that varied from pre-PCV period microbiological culture with Quellung serotyping to in the transition and post-PCV periods molecular methods like PCR. Meta-analysis revealed near elimination of pediatric PCV7-serotype PnCP between pre- and post-PCV, while the PCV13nonPCV7 percentage increased from 51.1% pre-PCV period to 76.5% in the transition period, remaining stable post-PCV period. Non-PCV13 serotypes increased slightly from low baseline numbers. Adult data were lacking or inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: Although studies were heterogeneous, pediatric PnCP incidence and proportion tended to decline from pre-PCV to post-PCV periods, and PCV13nonPCV7 serotype distribution percentage remained unchanged from transition to post-PCV period. Standardization of PnCP surveillance methods, definitions, and reporting is needed to evaluate accurately PCV program impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fletcher et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: