Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phenylacetylene and 1,1-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol displace the pyridyl and ethylene ligands of OsTp{κ 1 - C [NC 5 H 3 Me]}(η 2 -CH 2 ═CH 2 )(P i Pr 3 ) ( 1 ) to afford the alkynyl-vinylidene derivatives OsTp(C≡CR)(═C═CHR)(P i Pr 3 ) (Tp = hydridotris(pyrazolyl)borate; R = Ph, ( 2 ), C(OH)Ph 2 ( 3 )). Stirring of toluene solutions of 3 in the presence of neutral aluminum oxide initially produces the dehydration of the vinylidene ligand to give the alkynyl-allenylidene OsTp{C≡CC(OH)Ph 2 }(═C═C═CPh 2 )(P i Pr 3 ) ( 4 ), which subsequently undergoes a Meyer-Schuster rearrangement to yield the acyl-allenylidene OsTp{C(O)CH═CPh 2 }(═C═C═CPh 2 )(P i Pr 3 ) ( 5 ). In toluene, at 60 °C, the B–H bond of the Tp ligand of 5 abstracts the allene from the osmium coordination sphere by means of a 1,1-hydroboration of the Os–C α double bond. As a result, the acyl decarbonylation takes place to form Os( Ph2C═C═CH Tp)(CH═CPh 2 )(CO)(P i Pr 3 ) ( 6 ). In acetonitrile at 60 °C, the allene tautomerizes into the alkyne to afford Os( Ph2HCC≡C Tp)(CH═CPh 2 )(CO)(P i Pr 3 ) ( 7 ). The abstraction modifies the reactivity of the system toward HBF 4 . Thus, while the protonation of 5 leads to the alkylidyne [OsTp{C(O)CH═CPh 2 }(≡CCH═CPh 2 )(P i Pr 3 )]BF 4 ( 8 ), the protonation of 6 and 7 gives the alkylidenes [Os( Ph2C═C═CH Tp)(═CHCHPh 2 )(CO)(P i Pr 3 )]BF 4 ( 9 ) and [Os( Ph2HCC≡C Tp)(═CHCHPh 2 )(CO)(P i Pr 3 )]BF 4 ( 10 ). Both 9 and 10 are unstable in solution. In dichloromethane, at room temperature, they evolve into the corresponding olefin derivatives [Os( Ph2C═C═CH Tp)(η 2 -CH 2 ═CPh 2 )(CO)(P i Pr 3 )]BF 4 ( 11 ) and [Os( Ph2HCC≡C Tp)(η 2 -CH 2 ═CPh 2 )(CO)(P i Pr 3 )]BF 4 ( 12 ) by means of a C β,C α -hydrogen shift on the alkylidene ligand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bajo et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: