The affinity of PO 4 and SO 4 for reactive Al and Fe compounds may differ between the Bh and Bs horizons of Spodosols. Sorption of SO 4 and PO 4 in soils was investigated in four Spodosols from Northern Spain. Sorption experiments were carried out by adding 1.6 and 16.1 m M KH 2 PO 4 or 0.4 and 1.6 m M K 2 SO 4 to soils (soil/solution, 1:10). Most (98.5–99.8%) of the PO 4 added at 1.6 m M was retained by the illuvial Bh, Bhs, Bsh, and Bs horizons. The SO 4 retained by the same horizons at the same initial concentration was below 28%. Phosphate sorption at 16.1 m M in the Bh and Bhs horizons was significantly ( P < 0.05) greater than in the Bsh and Bs, corresponding to their greater oxalate extractable‐Al and –Fe contents, whereas the opposite was observed for SO 4 absorption. Sorption of PO 4 primarily displaced mineral‐bound organic C and, to a lesser extent, Si into solution, whereas sorption of SO 4 increased solution pH. The molar ratios of organic C released into solution and PO 4 sorbed were greater in the Bsh and Bs horizons than in the Bh and Bhs horizons. The differences observed in PO 4 and SO 4 sorption between Bh and Bs horizons were mainly attributed to the different organic C contents of the horizons and to the dissimilar affinities of the inorganic anions studied for reactive sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arbestain et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: