The conclusion [K. L. Ngai, A. K. Rajagopal, R. W. Rendell, and S. Teitler, Phys. Rev. B 28, 6073 (1983)] that simple exponential decay is a nonviable model for electrical relaxation, because it fails to satisfy the fundamental Paley–Wiener Fourier transform criterion, is shown by direct analysis to be inapplicable to small-signal electrical relaxation situations. Thus, not only is exponential decay and its associated single-relaxation-time Debye frequency response a valid model for relaxation, but, by extension, all distributions of relaxations times and energies which use a superposition of simple exponentials or Debye functions are also acceptable descriptions of relaxation phenomena. Reasons why the earlier conclusion is nonviable in the present context are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Ross Macdonald (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: