Why the study?
Patients with myocardial infarction remain at high risk of secondary events despite pharmacological advances, prompting the need to monitor their differential response to P2Y12 inhibitors.
Does ticagrelor differentially modulate plasma metabolomics, specifically polyunsaturated fatty acids, compared to clopidogrel in patients with myocardial infarction?
Does ticagrelor differentially modulate plasma metabolomics, specifically polyunsaturated fatty acids, compared to clopidogrel in patients with myocardial infarction?
Ticagrelor treatment in MI patients is associated with a distinct metabolomic signature involving omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids compared to clopidogrel, which may contribute to its cardiovascular benefits.
Untargeted metabolomics is used to refine the development of biomarkers for the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. Myocardial infarction (MI) has major individual and societal consequences for patients, who remain at high risk of secondary events, despite advances in pharmacological therapy. To monitor their differential response to treatment, we performed untargeted plasma metabolomics on 175 patients from the platelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial treated with ticagrelor and clopidogrel, two common P 2 Y 12 inhibitors. We identified a signature that discriminates patients, which involves polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and particularly the omega-3 fatty acids docosahexaenoate and eicosapentaenoate. The known cardiovascular benefits of PUFAs could contribute to the efficacy of ticagrelor. Our work, beyond pointing out the high relevance of untargeted metabolomics in evaluating response to treatment, establishes PUFA metabolism as a pathway of clinical interest in the recovery path from MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samman et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: