This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In this study, we investigated whether brain-to-brain coupling patterns could predict performance in a time-estimation task which requires two players to cooperate. The participant pairs, were tasked with synchronising button presses after converging on a shared representation of ’short’, ’medium’, and ’long’ time intervals while utilizing feedback to adjust responses. We employed EEG-hyperscanning and focused on post-feedback brain activity. We found that negative feedback led to increased frontal mid-line theta activity across individuals. Moreover, a correlation in post-feedback theta power between players forecasted failed joint action, while an anti-correlation forecasted success. These findings suggest that temporally coupled feedback related brain activity between two individuals serves as an indicator of redundancy in adjustment of a common goal representation. Additionally, the anti-correlation of this activity reflects cognitive strategic mechanisms that ensure optimal joint action outcomes. Rather than a paired overcompensation , successful cooperation requires flexible strategic agility from both partners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Markiewicz et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: