Why the study?
Does oral DuP 532 have comparable angiotensin II antagonist activity to losartan in healthy male subjects?
Does oral DuP 532 have comparable angiotensin II antagonist activity to losartan in healthy male subjects?
Despite similar in vitro AT1-receptor potency, DuP 532 is a weaker in vivo angiotensin II antagonist than losartan, highlighting the impact of plasma protein binding on in vivo efficacy.
DuP 532 yields weaker in vivo AT1 blockade than losartan; confirms plasma protein binding can limit clinical efficacy despite comparable in vitro potency.
We investigated the tolerability and angiotensin II antagonist activity of oral DuP 532 in healthy male subjects. DuP 532 (1 to 200 mg) was well tolerated, with no effect on blood pressure or heart rate. Compared with losartan (100 mg), DuP 532 (200 mg) was a weak antagonist of pressor responses to intravenous angiotensin II. Maximum inhibition of diastolic pressor response was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84%, 88%) approximately 4.6 hours after losartan and 48% (95% CI, 38%, 56%) 8.7 hours after DuP 532. Twenty-four hours after dosing, inhibition by losartan and DuP 532 was similar (40% to 45%). DUP 532 is extensively bound in human plasma, with an in vitro free fraction of 0.06. Although DuP 532 and EXP3174 (losartan's active metabolite) have similar AT1-receptor potency, and plasma concentrations of DuP 532 were much greater than losartan/EXP3174, the level of antagonism was much less for DuP 532. These results indicate that multiple factors determine the in vivo potency of angiotensin II antagonists, including affinity for and distribution to the receptor as modulated by plasma binding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldberg et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: