Why the study?
Does quinapril improve regulatory and adaptive status, echocardiographic parameters, and exercise capacity compared to metoprolol succinate in patients with NYHA class II chronic heart failure and stage II essential arterial hypertension?
Does quinapril improve regulatory and adaptive status, echocardiographic parameters, and exercise capacity compared to metoprolol succinate in patients with NYHA class II chronic heart failure and stage II essential arterial hypertension?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quinapril appears more effective than metoprolol succinate at improving left ventricular structure, systolic function, exercise capacity, and NT-proBNP levels over 6 months in patients with NYHA class II heart failure and stage II hypertension.
Aim. To identify the optimal treatment tactics in patients with Functional Class (FC) II chronic heart failure (CHF) (NYHA classification) and essential arterial hypertension (EAH), via investigating the effects of different medication classes on regulatory and adaptive status (RAS). Material and methods. The study included 100 patients with FC II CHF and Stage II EAH, who were randomised into 2 groups. Group I included 53 patients (mean age 52,9±2,3 years) receiving metoprolol succinate (mean dose 97,3±9,5 mg/d). Group II included 47 patients (mean age 57,5±1,3 years) administered quinapril (mean dose 24,7±6,3 mg/d). At baseline and after 6 months of therapy, the following procedures were performed: treadmill test with VO2max assessment; echocardiography; 24-hour blood pressure monitoring; N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level measurement; and cardio-respiratory synchronism test. Results. While both medications improved left ventricular (LV) diastolic function, only quinapril demonstrated beneficial effects on LV structure, geometry, and systolic function. Only in Group II, exercise capacity and VO2max increased, RAS improved, and NT-proBNP levels decreased to a greater extent. Conclusion. Quinapril was more effective than metoprolol succinate in the treatment of patients with FC II CHF and Stage II EAH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanorskyi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: