Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article, I trace the relation between the figure of voice and subjectivity by examining a Nepali reform movement that sought to give daughters a birth right to ancestral property. At its heart was a contest over emerging class and gender subjectivities that were repeatedly defined through the figure of the voice and related practices of address, hailing, and recognition. The competing formations of voice I discuss here entail shifting notions of intimacy. To challenge property relations thus meant to change existing practices of speech, sentiment, and the meaning of voice itself. [ voice, sentiment, property, subjectivity, Nepal, gender, class distinction ]
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laura Kunreuther (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: