Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives To compare the detection rates of [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT vs. [ 18 F]-FDG PET MRI/CT in gastric cancer. Methods An extensive librarian-led literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed. The primary outcomes were sensitivity in patient-based evaluations, detection of lymph node metastases, and peritoneal involvement. Results Five studies, including 148 participants, were analyzed. [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT has a comparatively high sensitivity in patient-based evaluations compared with [ 18 F]-FDG PET MRI/CT (risk difference = 0.16, 95% CI 0.09–0.22, P < 0.00001). The [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT group has a comparatively higher sensitivity in detecting lymph node metastases (RR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.01–0.29, P = 0.04), peritoneal involvement (RR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38–0.72, P < 0.00001) in gastric cancer than [ 18 F]-FDG PET MRI/CT group. Conclusions This systematic review confirmed the advantage of [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT in gastric cancer. [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT was superior to [ 18 F]-FDG PET MRI/CT in detecting the primary tumor, lymph node metastases, and peritoneal metastases. More studies are needed for the sensitivity and specificity of [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT in different pathological types of gastric cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: