Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The following pairs of monomers were copolymerized using the catalyst system CpTiCl 3 /methylaluminoxane (MAO): 1,3‐butadiene/( E )‐1,3‐pentadiene, 1,3‐butadiene/4‐methyl‐1,3‐pentadiene and 4‐methyl‐1,3‐pentadiene/( Z )‐1,3‐pentadiene. The copolymers were characterized by NMR and infrared examination. 4‐Methyl‐1,3‐pentadiene/( Z )‐1,3‐pentadiene and 1,3‐butadiene/( E )‐1,3‐pentadiene gave copolymers having a composition intermediate between that of an ideal and that of an alternating copolymer. 1,3‐Butadiene/4‐methyl‐1,3‐pentadiene gave block copolymers only. These results have been interpreted on the basis of a different mode of coordination of the monomers. The cis ‐η 4 coordination is by far the most stable for 1,3‐butadiene and ( E )‐1,3‐pentadiene, while for ( Z )‐1,3‐pentadiene and 4‐methyl‐1,3‐pentadiene there is probably an equilibrium between the cis ‐η 4 and trans ‐η 2 form. Both these forms are reactive in the case of ( Z )‐1,3‐pentadiene, while only the trans ‐η 2 form is so in the case of 4‐methyl‐1,3‐pentadiene.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ricci et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: