Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper argues that the school effectiveness/school improvement movement has provided an antidote to the pessimism and fatalism of the 1970s. However, it is deficient in four important respects: (1) it places too much emphasis on the notion of progressive school management as the dynamic of change; (2) it fails to take full account of the characteristics of the education system as a whole; (3) it shows little regard for issues of social class; (4) it has little to say about issues of curriculum content and pedagogy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clyde Chitty (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: