Why the study?
Does oral gabapentin reduce the increase in arterial pressure and heart rate associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in normotensive patients undergoing elective surgery?
Does oral gabapentin reduce the increase in arterial pressure and heart rate associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in normotensive patients undergoing elective surgery?
A single 800 mg oral dose of gabapentin given 1 hour before surgery effectively attenuates the cardiovascular pressor response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.
Supports 800 mg gabapentin premedication to blunt intubation hemodynamics; extends evidence for perioperative use in normotensive patients.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We have compared the effects of gabapentin on arterial pressure and heart rate at induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation in a randomized double-blind study. METHODS: Ninety normotensive patients (ASA I) undergoing elective surgery were divided into three groups of 30 patients each. Patients received oral placebo (Group I), 400 mg of gabapentin (Group II) or 800 mg of gabapentin (Group III) 1 h prior to surgery in the operating theatre. After induction of anaesthesia heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded at baseline 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 min after intubation. RESULTS: Patients receiving placebo and 400 mg gabapentin showed a significant increase in blood pressure and heart rate associated with tracheal intubation compared to baseline levels and Group III. There was significant decrease in heart rate and arterial pressure in Group III after intubation 1, 3, 5 and 10 min (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.05 and P < 0.05, respectively) compared to Groups I and II. CONCLUSION: Given 1 h before operation gabapentin 800 mg blunted the arterial pressure and heart rate increase in first 10 min due to endotracheal intubation. Oral administration of gabapentin 800 mg before induction of anaesthesia is a simple and practical method for attenuating pressor response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation after standard elective induction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Memiş et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: