Why the study?
Catheter ablation is recommended after failed or intolerant AAD treatment for AF, but clinical performance and safety of cryoballoon PVI needed evaluation in Japan.
Does pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon prevent recurrence of atrial arrhythmias in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Does pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon prevent recurrence of atrial arrhythmias in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation demonstrates high efficacy (86.7% freedom from recurrence at 2 years) and low complication rates in a real-world Japanese registry.
Supports cryoballoon PVI safety in Japanese PAF patients; hypothesis-generating for broader use pending randomized data.
PURPOSE: Catheter ablation is a recommended rhythm control therapy after failed or intolerant antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluates clinical performance and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the cryoballoon (Arctic Front Advance) in Japan. METHODS: Cryo AF Global Registry is a prospective, multi-center registry. Patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) were treated at 10 Japanese hospitals. Efficacy was evaluated by freedom from a ≥ 30-s recurrence of AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT), AF-related symptoms, and quality of life using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. The safety endpoint was serious device- and procedure-related adverse events. RESULTS: The study included 352 patients with PAF (65 ± 10 years of age, 36% female, 36% without prior failure of AAD). Mean duration since first diagnosis of AF was 3.0 ± 5.5 years. Serious device- and procedure-related adverse event rate was 2.6% (95% CI: 1.2-4.8%). Freedom from AF/AFL/AT was 88.5% (95% CI: 84.7-91.4%) at 12 months and 86.7% (95% CI: 81.1-90.8%) at 24 months. The number of patients with ≥ 1 AF symptom was significantly decreased from 88% at enrollment to 22% (p < 0.01) at 12-month follow-up. General quality of life using EQ-5D did not improve significantly after 12 months in the summary score. However, in the visual analog scale score, there was improvement (5.8 ± 18.4; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that cryoablation used for PVI is a safe and effective treatment in real-world use for patients with PAF in Japan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimura et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: