The variation of saturation magnetisation, M s , with temperature has been derived from FMR measurements performed on amorphous (a-)(Fe 1-x Ni x ) 75 B 25 and (Fe 1-y W y ) 83 B 17 alloys in the temperature range 77 to 300 K. These data have been analysed to yield reliable values of the coefficients B, C of the T 3/2 , T 5/2 terms in the spin wave expression for the fractional decrease in magnetisation with temperature and the mean-square range of the exchange interaction, (r 2 ). The spin wave theory for amorphous ferromagnets due to Krey adequately describes the observed dependence of the above parameters (B, C, (r 2 )) on the Curie temperature, T C (determined from low-field (<or=10 Oe) bulk magnetisation data). The plot of spin wave stiffness coefficient, D, against T C for a-(Fe 1-x Ni x ) 75 B 25 alloys is a straight line, well represented by the empirical equation D=D 0 +mT C , whose slope m exactly coincides with that predicted by the nearest-neighbour (nn) Heisenberg model and intercept, D 0 , on the ordinate gives the strength of the next-nearest-neighbour (nnn) exchange coupling constant which is at least one order of magnitude smaller than the nn exchange coupling constant. A plot of D against T C for a-(Fe 1-y W y ) 83 B 17 alloys is again a straight line with the same slope m but passing through the origin (i.e. D 0 =0). This result is shown to imply that the competing interactions in W containing glasses confine the direct exchange to the nearest neighbours only whereas the exchange interactions in Ni containing alloys involve both the nearest as well as the next-nearest neighbours. Other important findings include (i) mixed exchange interactions cause more drastic reduction in the value of T C , M s (0) and D than does simple magnetic dilution and (ii) for a given value of T C , D possesses a considerably lower value for the W substituted alloys than for the Ni substituted ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaul et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: