Why the study?
To determine whether platelet hyperaggregability correlates with short closure times and is associated with venous thrombosis risk in a Spanish population.
Is platelet hyperaggregability associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis?
Is platelet hyperaggregability associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis?
Platelet hyperaggregability is not independently associated with the risk of developing venous thrombosis after adjusting for age.
Adjusted analyses show no independent link between hyperaggregability and VTE risk; leaves open whether aggregation testing aids prediction.
The aim of the study was to determine whether platelet hyperaggregability correlates with short closure times (PFA-100) and if hyperaggregability is associated with the risk of venous thrombosis in a Spanish population. Case--control study (RETROVE project) involving 400 patients with venous thrombosis and 400 healthy controls. We determined platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) by light transmission aggregometry. Various concentrations of two aggregation agonists [ADP and epinephrine (EPI)] were tested to determine the percentage of maximal aggregation and the percentage area under the curve (AUC). Venous thrombosis risk associated with platelet hyperaggregability was calculated by logistic regression. We estimated the crude and adjusted (by sex and age) odds ratios (OR) for venous thrombosis risk. An agonist concentration of 0.5 μmol/l differentiated between hypo-responders and hyper-responders at the following AUC cut-off values: EPI: the 50th percentile for aggregation with 0.5 μmol/l of EPI (EPI_AUC) was 22.53% (>22.53% = hyper-EPI); the crude risk for venous thrombosis was statistically significant (OR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.03-1.82); ADP: the 75th percentile for aggregation with 0.5 μmol/l of ADP (ADP_AUC) was 29.6% (>29.6% = hyper-ADP), with a significant crude risk for venous thrombosis (OR = 1.44; 95% CI 1.05-1.98). However, after adjustment for confounders (age), the ORs for EPI or ADP aggregation were no longer significant. EPI_AUC and PFA-100 values with the EPI agonist were significantly correlated (R = -0.342, P < 0.01). Only 12% of the PFA-100 values were explained by platelet aggregation. In this case--control study, platelet hyperaggregability was not associated with the risk of developing venous thrombosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Llobet et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: